Does a professional convening intervention catalyze conditions to improve conceptual use of research evidence and research epistemology among turnaround school leaders?
The grant will support National Public Radio’s (NPR) continuing coverage of trends and developments that affect children and youth in the United States.
Does a suite of tools help clinical supervisors use evidence when making decisions about whether, when, and how to culturally adapt mental health treatment for Latine families?
The Institute for Equity in Child Opportunity & Healthy Development (IECOHD), the Center for Poverty and Social Policy, and Children’s Health Watch seek to leverage a policy window to extend public benefit eligibility requirements to immigrant families.
Does engaging in a cross-state research-practice partnership facilitate state-level educational technology leaders’ use of research evidence to inform equitable use of education technology?
How and under what conditions does boundary-spanning infrastructure connect researchers, practice leaders, and community leaders in ways that improve the use of research to inform equity-minded decision making?
The Education Law Center, Research for Action, and Evidence Use in Action will partner to examine what role the U.S. Department of Education has played in the delivery of education opportunity.
With the courts serving as a space than can reduce or exacerbate youth inequity, studies can illuminate strategies to improve the use of research evidence in the courts to inform youth-related court rulings.
We need studies to cultivate routine use of high-quality research in legal decision-making, rigorous tests to examine the effectiveness of these strategies, and causal assessments of whether increased research use translate to better youth outcomes eventually.
The William T. Grant Foundation invests in high-quality research focused on reducing inequality in youth outcomes and improving the use of research evidence in decisions that affect young people in the United States.
