Grant

Understanding Educational Gender- and Sexual-Diversity Reforms and the Use of Evidence in Politically Divisive Contexts

How do district administrators use gender- and sexual-diversity educational reform research to influence LGBTQ+ student outcomes?

How district leaders use data and research about LGBTQ+ adolescents to initiate protective or harmful programs is a critical component in navigating educational policy conversations. Currently, beliefs and values appear to outpace data and research use. As data about LGBTQ+ students becomes politicized, community members’ trust in gender- and sexual-diversity reform research, which studies ways to improve policies, practices, and societal attitudes to affirm the full spectrum of gender identities and sexual orientations, may weaken. To build a stronger empirical evidence base about the use and consequences of data and research related to LGBTQ+ students, McQuillan will use this award to examine the sensemaking routines of district administrators regarding gender- and sexual-diversity reform evidence and examine how district administrators’ data and research use routines about gender and sexual diversity reform evidence affects LGBTQ+ student outcomes. The study will also improve the measurement that guides research and informs district administrators when developing gender- and sexual-diversity reforms. V. Paul Poteat, Professor of Counseling, Developmental and Education Psychology at Boston College, will provide mentorship on relational and cognitive processes involved in how school-based organizational routines influence students. Jennifer Dykema, Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Wisconsin, will provide mentorship on survey development and data validity.

Subscribe for Updates